Charities often face challenges in executing their activities, especially in regions where their staff may be unable to operate effectively. In such cases, charities turn to intermediaries who can provide essential resources, skills, and regional knowledge. However, working through an intermediary comes with its own set of considerations and responsibilities to ensure compliance with regulatory frameworks. In this article, we explore the dynamics of charity-intermediary relationships, common types of intermediaries, and the importance of maintaining control over resources.
Understanding Intermediaries:
Common Types of Intermediaries:
1. Consultant or Contractor: A consultant or contractor intermediary is engaged to carry out specific activities on behalf of the charity. This could involve hiring a non-profit organization or a for-profit contractor to provide services or expertise. A clear agreement detailing roles, responsibilities, and reporting mechanisms is crucial to maintaining control.
2. Joint Venture Participant: In a joint venture, a charity collaborates with other organizations to achieve a shared goal. Unlike a consultant or contractor, the charity actively participates in decision-making through a joint venture agreement.
3. Co-operative Participants: Co-operative participants work alongside a charity on specific aspects of a project, with each organization taking responsibility for distinct parts. This differs from a joint venture, where participants pool resources for the project as a whole.
Working through intermediaries can be a strategic approach for charities to extend their impact. However, it requires careful consideration, including the selection of suitable partners, maintaining control over resources, and adhering to regulatory guidelines. By understanding the nuances of different intermediary types and incorporating best practices in agreements, charities can navigate these partnerships successfully, ensuring their resources contribute effectively to their mission.